FHIR Chat · Can I change colours of an HL7 FHIR template? · IG creation

Stream: IG creation

Topic: Can I change colours of an HL7 FHIR template?


view this post on Zulip Jean Duteau (Mar 16 2022 at 17:30):

I have created a template for the Vulcan accelerator and I'm wondering what leeway we have in changing the look and feel? I can obviously add a logo (which I did) but can we change the colour scheme?

view this post on Zulip David Pyke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:31):

Yep, you can change almost everything based on a project.css file in a custom template. It's fairly straightforward

view this post on Zulip David Pyke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:32):

You can see it in action in the Carequality template I created https://github.com/Carequality/ig-template-carequality

view this post on Zulip Jean Duteau (Mar 16 2022 at 17:32):

i know that I can technically change those things. I've done that for other projects. I was asking more of a governance - am I allowed to change them?

view this post on Zulip David Pyke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:34):

For an HL7 FHIR IG, they have to stick to the colour scheme, for any other it's up to you.

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:34):

yup, I understood this is an HL7 product governance question

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:34):

so where does it allow them to change graphics, but not colors?

view this post on Zulip David Pyke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:35):

It allows for the addition of a second logo, if it's an accellerator and/or a joint copyright project.

view this post on Zulip Jean Duteau (Mar 16 2022 at 17:35):

is an Accelerator IG considered an HL7 FHIR IG? It's published by HL7 so I'm assuming so and none of the other Accelerators changed the colours. But they all added a logo.

view this post on Zulip Jean Duteau (Mar 16 2022 at 17:35):

David Pyke said:

It allows for the addition of a second logo, if it's an accellerator and/or a joint copyright project.

Where is "it" defined?

view this post on Zulip David Pyke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:36):

I'm not sure of the formal policy location, just how it's been implemented

view this post on Zulip David Pyke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:37):

Talk to your Accellerator contact at HL7 (or Melva), they'll know for sure

view this post on Zulip Jean Duteau (Mar 16 2022 at 17:41):

did a search of HL7 Confluence and could not find any governance discussion around templates

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Mar 16 2022 at 17:46):

@Lloyd McKenzie

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 16 2022 at 18:16):

Accelerator IGs are considered HL7 FHIR IGs. They'll go through balloting like any other HL7 IG

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 16 2022 at 18:18):

We haven't set a firm rule prohibiting changes to color or other formatting, but my general leaning would be against it. Adding the accelerator logo is sufficient to differentiate. From a branding and consistency perspective, we want all HL7 IGs (whether developed within an accelerator or not) to have a consistent appearance and behavior. Also, the colors are intended to differentiate between FHIR, CDA and v2 IGs, so divergence loses us that benefit.

view this post on Zulip David Pyke (Mar 16 2022 at 18:52):

That sounds like something the FMG should discuss and issue an edict on.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Mar 16 2022 at 20:07):

technically, this is a product management issue that I rule on. And if I do, then it'll be current practice as described by Lloyd: colour is for product family, and accelerators add a logo for the accelerator


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC