Stream: registry.fhir.org
Topic: How useful is a registry without context
Eric Haas (Sep 30 2017 at 00:03):
I was hoping the registry would allow for more than a SD so could add valuable context and usage notes. For example, many profiles are created in the context of an Implementation Guide and listing a profile or extension independently will deprive the reader of this information. Or is the idea that the SD.description or SD.text will be so thorough and complete as to make any additional information unnecessary?
Grahame Grieve (Sep 30 2017 at 07:21):
the idea is that the resources will contain a link back to their implementation guide to provide this context - registry.fhir.org isn't the place to solve that problem. Simplifier might be for things done through simplifier
Eric Haas (Oct 02 2017 at 13:57):
ok that makes sense.
Richard Townley-O'Neill (Oct 02 2017 at 22:54):
Where in the SD would you put the reference to an IG?
Richard Townley-O'Neill (Oct 02 2017 at 22:55):
IGs have reference to SDs, but where is the natural place to put a reverse reference?
Grahame Grieve (Oct 02 2017 at 22:59):
there isn't a place
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
