FHIR Chat · NPM Package resolution · tooling

Stream: tooling

Topic: NPM Package resolution


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 04 2020 at 03:18):

@Martijn Harthoorn does adding support for https://jira.hl7.org/browse/FHIR-25772 in the java tooling imply that we should change the FHIR NPM package spec? @Nick George

view this post on Zulip Martijn Harthoorn (Feb 04 2020 at 10:24):

We don't mention it explicitly. And our tooling doesn't support it.

view this post on Zulip Martijn Harthoorn (Feb 04 2020 at 10:35):

Btw, the ticket refers to the "npm spec", but it's actually just the npm docs.

view this post on Zulip Martijn Harthoorn (Feb 04 2020 at 10:35):

(if you get my point)

view this post on Zulip Martijn Harthoorn (Feb 04 2020 at 10:38):

My feeling is that -- if people want to rely on the npm client, just go a head and do so. but as a FHIR specification, we should not try to keep up with the npm docs, as they are more of a make-it-up-as-you-go-along than a standard.

view this post on Zulip Martijn Harthoorn (Feb 04 2020 at 10:40):

The use case of wanting to use it in a private setting that is not meant for publication, by pointing to a package that is not available as a dependency to others, should imho take us to say: let's not allow it on a public FHIR server.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 04 2020 at 12:27):

agree not to allow it on a public server. I just got asked to implement it

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 07 2020 at 03:33):

#GF25772 - we decided to allow this but it won't be supported on the ci-build or packages.fhir.org

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Apr 16 2020 at 03:44):

@Ward Weistra the package https://packages.simplifier.net/gefyra.sandbox/0.0.2 has 2 copies of package.json in it

view this post on Zulip Ward Weistra (Apr 16 2020 at 07:16):

Thanks @Grahame Grieve, that's clearly wrong. I'll take up task to prevent that.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC