Stream: terminology
Topic: Validate Codings with no ValueSet
Lee Surprenant (Sep 19 2017 at 15:58):
is there any 'best practices' for servers to validate a Coding that is not defined by a ValueSet? I understand the validation would be system-specific, but it seems like a server should reject a CodeableConcept that has an invalid SNOMED CT concept (or expression) with a system of SNOMED CT. Is that level of checking being done in practice?
Yunwei Wang (Sep 19 2017 at 16:17):
There will be a new operation in CodeSystem to validate code against a known system. Change is schedule in STU4.
Tracker 12700: https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=12700&start=0
Lee Surprenant (Sep 19 2017 at 16:30):
thanks yunwei. any idea what folks are doing (if anything) for this in DSTU2/STU3?
Yunwei Wang (Sep 19 2017 at 16:43):
There are different server implementation strategies. For FHIR test server, if you don't specify a value set, the server validate code on code system level. Here is an example: http://test.fhir.org/r3/ValueSet/$validate-code?code=301706005&system=http://snomed.info/sct
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC