FHIR Chat · QA Review - nullFrequently · terminology

Stream: terminology

Topic: QA Review - nullFrequently


view this post on Zulip Peter Jordan (Nov 18 2018 at 05:19):

Does the word 'nullFrequently' that appears as the start of the comments on the resource element definitions of ValueSet.copyright and ConceptMap.copyright have any meaning - or should those sentences start with 'Frequently'? If so, can these be classed as spelling errors/typos that I can correct without creating Tracker Items?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Nov 18 2018 at 11:07):

if you can figure out how to correct them, please do. But you do need a task to track the work

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 18 2018 at 13:09):

They can certainly be classed as a "typo" tracker that doesn't require work group vote to make the change. I suspect you'll find it's tooling-driven.

view this post on Zulip Peter Jordan (Nov 18 2018 at 21:32):

Tracker #19669
Simple enough to edit HTML file in QA process, but will that subsequently be overwritten by tooling?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Nov 18 2018 at 22:41):

absolutely. someone will have to chase down the null - probably coming from java code


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC