FHIR Chat · Multiple codes for concepts, instance edition · terminology

Stream: terminology

Topic: Multiple codes for concepts, instance edition


view this post on Zulip Jay Lyle (Apr 06 2021 at 10:58):

In our legacy Coverage file, there are 4 different fields for subscriber relationship to patient (original, hipaa, ncpdp (2)). I think we can call these different representations of a single relationship, so we can populate the 0..1 CodeableConcept with 4 Codings with different systems. Right?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 06 2021 at 16:25):

If they're all representing the same relationship, that's fine.

view this post on Zulip Robert McClure (Apr 08 2021 at 23:54):

@Jay Lyle I think you should provide an example or two. I'm struggling to imagine a situation where some sort of concept from each of those areas (original, hippa, NCPDP, NCPDP) can all represent the same idea.

view this post on Zulip Jay Lyle (Apr 09 2021 at 14:10):

Sure:
File FileName Field FieldName Code Label
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 01 SPOUSE
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 18 SELF
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 19 CHILD
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 20 EMPLOYEE
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 29 SIGNIFICANT OTHER
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 32 MOTHER
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 33 FATHER
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 39 ORGAN DONOR
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 41 INJURED PLAINTIFF
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA 53 LIFE PARTNER
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.03 PT. RELATIONSHIP - HIPAA G8 OTHER RELATIONSHIP
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.05 PHARMACY RELATIONSHIP CODE 0 NOT SPECIFIED
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.05 PHARMACY RELATIONSHIP CODE 1 CARDHOLDER
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.05 PHARMACY RELATIONSHIP CODE 2 SPOUSE
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.05 PHARMACY RELATIONSHIP CODE 3 CHILD
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 4.05 PHARMACY RELATIONSHIP CODE 4 OTHER
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 6 WHOSE INSURANCE v Veteran
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 6 WHOSE INSURANCE s Spouse
2.312 INSURANCE TYPE 6 WHOSE INSURANCE o Other

view this post on Zulip Robert McClure (Apr 09 2021 at 14:52):

Ok - so I think what you are saying is as an example, that relationship element for a single instance might have HIPAA 01, NCPDP 1, original s. If so then I agree with Lloyd, you can put all three in that example into one codableconcept. You'll need to define a code system for each and keep in mind that these are all external code systems so if a standards IG you need to get HTA to represent the metadata. And we'll need to clarify the IP for NCPDP. I'd guess HIPAA is actually VA-HIPPA?


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC