Stream: terminology
Topic: IG for R4 using Current UTG
John Moehrke (Mar 30 2020 at 16:40):
How can we have an IG for use with FHIR R4, but that uses current UTG vocabulary? There are improved codes we need that are not in the vocabulary at FHIR R4.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 30 2020 at 19:03):
I'm not actually sure. In principle, you just reference UTG but UTG is special and I haven't figured that out yet
John Moehrke (Mar 30 2020 at 19:30):
we are just referencing code system http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode, but we are not getting the UTG verison, we are getting the FHIR R4 version... which is missing codes we need.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 30 2020 at 19:59):
right. what's special about UTG is that the things it defines are already defined in the base for legacy reasons
John Moehrke (Mar 31 2020 at 15:25):
codes in the R4 are from 2018, missing many of the improvements Kathleen has made in 2 years.. and those improements are needed for the DS4P projects
John Moehrke (Mar 31 2020 at 15:26):
so we simply want to force the IG to use the current terminology, and not be stuck with the R4 terminology.
John Moehrke (Mar 31 2020 at 15:30):
so, for example... all of the CUI codes -- see this valueset in the DS4P IG that can't expand because it gets the wrong terminology server http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/fhir-security-label-ds4p/branches/master/ValueSet-valueset-cui-mark.html
Grahame Grieve (Mar 31 2020 at 20:34):
I understand.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
