FHIR Chat · How to determine terminology resources' uris? · terminology

Stream: terminology

Topic: How to determine terminology resources' uris?


view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Nov 07 2020 at 03:54):

In a context of underdeveloped HIT communities, various terminology resources still remain in the paper-based age, their official/recognized uris look like a dream.

view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Nov 07 2020 at 03:56):

So I'm confused about how to select uris for them, I mean those national/regional ones.

view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Nov 07 2020 at 10:24):

Use a NamingSystem resource for this?

view this post on Zulip Jose Costa Teixeira (Nov 07 2020 at 12:25):

My understanding is that the uris do not have to resolve, they act as a unique identifier for the code systems

view this post on Zulip Jose Costa Teixeira (Nov 07 2020 at 12:26):

that means that as long as the uri is unique in your jurisdiction/domain, you are good.

view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Nov 07 2020 at 13:15):

Yeah, I agree. But consensus would be needed to avoid proliferation of various URIs.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 07 2020 at 20:30):

Yes. This is a governance issue for each country/region. You have to agree on a process to agree on and register URIs for 'common public identifiers' - license numbers, national and regional patient ids, etc. - any identifier that could conceivably be captured in lots of independent systems outside the scope of the organization that defined the identifier. NamingSystem gives you a way to computably share those definitions and stick them in a registry, but you still need a process of deciding and agreeing what they're going to be.

view this post on Zulip Lin Zhang (Nov 08 2020 at 01:51):

@Lloyd McKenzie Appreciate it so much! It resolved my concern.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC