FHIR Chat · GF#17350 - ordinal value · terminology

Stream: terminology

Topic: GF#17350 - ordinal value


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 20 2018 at 03:32):

I have applied GF#17350, which rationalised the multiple extensions we had for ordinal value down to a single extension. One consequence of this change was to mean a change to the definition, which had previously said that ordinal values could only be defined in code systems. We have lots of uses of ordinal values that are context specific - so I changed the definition to say that the value has to be defined in context (see build.fhir.org/extension-iso21090-ordinal-value.html)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 20 2018 at 03:35):

however, there's a proposal from SDC to extend the use of this extension to allow ordinal values to be assigned to Questionnaire.item.answerOption.value[x]. I think this is reasonable, but does anyone from Vocab strongly oppose this (it's a little unclear who owns some of the extensions- work to sort this out after R4 is published)

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Jul 20 2018 at 03:36):

The url is not resolving so I haven't seen it yet, but that sounds reasonable to me - both of them.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 20 2018 at 03:36):

it's building now...

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Jul 20 2018 at 03:36):

that's what I figured

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Jul 20 2018 at 03:37):

I'm also building now - hopefully it will succeed


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC