Stream: terminology
Topic: Extensible bindings
Grahame Grieve (Feb 16 2017 at 01:17):
The resolution on GF#8723 says "(for the usecase where extensible bindings need information about bindings in the parent to correctly decide whether a concept is already present in the ancestry of bindings"
Grahame Grieve (Feb 16 2017 at 01:17):
I don't have a clue what that actually means.
Rob Hausam (Feb 16 2017 at 01:24):
Looks like it has my name on it (as the second). And I think maybe I actually do know what it means. I have to go now, though - but I can come back to it in about 3 hours or so. Although I will say after reading it again that maybe you had the right idea with "I'm not in favour of this. These all sound like extensions to me".
Grahame Grieve (Feb 16 2017 at 01:31):
indeed...
Grahame Grieve (Jun 01 2018 at 06:27):
Posted as a follow up to a discussion in Cologne at the request of @Robert McClure : http://www.healthintersections.com.au/?p=2810
Rob Hausam (Jun 01 2018 at 10:54):
@Grahame Grieve Very nice discussion of the issue(s). One thing to correct that I noted is that you are talking about extensible bindings but the profile snippet has "strength": "example".
Rob Hausam (Jun 01 2018 at 10:56):
On the blog posts I assume it's better to comment there than here? Or best to do both?
Grahame Grieve (Jun 01 2018 at 11:14):
I'll fix the example. I guess detailed discussion here, summary points there...
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
