FHIR Chat · Designations in $expand · terminology

Stream: terminology

Topic: Designations in $expand


view this post on Zulip Jack Bowie (Aug 06 2018 at 23:51):

When expanding a ValueSet with the 'designation' parameter(s), are the returned designations to be selected/drawn from the union of the ValueSet designations specified in the VS definition and the CodeSystem designations specified in the CS definition for each concept?

Also, does the existence of $expand 'designation' override the default or explicit value of the 'includeDesignations' parameter?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 01:00):

does the existence of $expand 'designation' override the default or explicit value of the 'includeDesignations' parameter?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 07 2018 at 01:00):

which two things are you referring to?

view this post on Zulip Peter Jordan (Aug 07 2018 at 01:18):

If the includeDesignations In Parameter to an $expand request is set to false, I would expect a server to ignore the designation In Parameter. Do others agree?

view this post on Zulip Jack Bowie (Aug 07 2018 at 01:20):

The expand operation has a 'includeDesignations' (Boolean) parameter and a 'designation' (multiple String) parameter. If 'includeDesignations' is false (or absent) are any designation Strings ignored?

view this post on Zulip Jack Bowie (Aug 07 2018 at 21:18):

@Peter Jordan That works for me.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC