Stream: terminology
Topic: ConceptMap.group.element.target.dependsOn
Daniel Vreeman (Mar 24 2021 at 16:43):
I saw @Michael Lawley 's write up of current issues and was recently exploring use of dependsOn as well. I was wondering about how this might work for quantitative properties, so the proposal makes sense to me. But, I was curious if someone here could point me to some examples of existing ConceptMaps making use of the current dependsOn structure? Thx in advance.
Rob Hausam (Mar 24 2021 at 16:48):
@Daniel Vreeman The LIVD Test Code ConceptMap is using dependsOn. It's at least one example.
Daniel Vreeman (Mar 25 2021 at 00:22):
Thanks @Rob Hausam ! That's helpful and is analogous to the use case I had. I do wonder about the example resource just using properties like "specimen" as just a string vs something in URI syntax per rfc3986.
Rob Hausam (Mar 30 2021 at 15:00):
Yes, I agree. The data type for property is uri, so the example is technically not correct (but I'm not recalling that we had build warnings for it?). That would be a good issue to log for the next version of the IG. We are also in the process of updating the way that dependsOn is structured in ConceptMap so that it is better structured and more robust, and hopefully those changes will make it in for the R5 draft.
Michael Lawley (Mar 31 2021 at 06:41):
Are relative URIs not valid here? Many use-cases for maps with dependsOn/product elements will not have formal URIs
Rob Hausam (Mar 31 2021 at 14:00):
You're right about relative URLs being valid, @Michael Lawley. I wasn't thinking of the strings we were using in the LIVD example as being that, but I suppose they may be.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
