FHIR Chat · Code System Definition · terminology

Stream: terminology

Topic: Code System Definition


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 10 2018 at 12:56):

GF#14726 - the code system definition is a copy/paste from value set, and has to be fixed.

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Feb 11 2018 at 06:59):

Yes. We also have GF#13450 and GF#14242 on the same subject.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 11 2018 at 10:56):

so should we wordsmith something here?

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Feb 11 2018 at 21:07):

yes - I was planning to come up with a suggestion
I can post something (or you can) and we can also discuss it on the Vocab tracker issues call tomorrow, if needed

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 12 2018 at 19:28):

well something along the lines of
A code system resource represents the definition of a set of concepts in a controlled framework which assigns codes to represent the concepts, designations that describe them, and properties and filters to help compute with them

view this post on Zulip Russ Hamm (Feb 12 2018 at 19:30):

Are we inventing a new definition, or should we pull/align with Core Principles or the Glossary Project?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 12 2018 at 19:36):

we should probably align, but given that we are defining a CodeSystem resource, not a Code System, it will be slightly different.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 12 2018 at 19:36):

the key difference between that a code system is one representation of the concept of a code system

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Feb 12 2018 at 19:51):

yes - it's the definition of the resource, not of "code system" itself
I'll work more on the wording before to the tracker issues call

view this post on Zulip Russ Hamm (Feb 12 2018 at 20:01):

Got it. Thanks Grahame.

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Feb 12 2018 at 21:27):

We affirmed on the tracker issues call to use the definition: "The CodeSystem resource is used to declare the existence of a code system and its key properties."

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 12 2018 at 23:29):

well, ok, but I'll put on my Lloyd hat and say 'that's tautological'

view this post on Zulip Richard Townley-O'Neill (Feb 12 2018 at 23:33):

It is also clarificatory. I see people confuse instances of the CodeSystem resource with code systems.

view this post on Zulip Michael Lawley (Feb 13 2018 at 01:15):

It's also often used to do more than declare the existence of a code system, it's used to actually describe it and in some cases define it.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 13 2018 at 01:49):

Keep in mind that implementers of FHIR are not expected to be familiar with nor read Core Principles.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 13 2018 at 03:31):

no so we won't reference it, but we do want to be consistent

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (Feb 13 2018 at 04:21):

I agree that definition leaves out the "describe" and "define" bits that Michael mentioned. Here's an attempt that is more wordy but also more complete: "The CodeSystem resource is used to declare the existence of and describe a code system or code system supplement and its key properties, and optionally define a part or all of its content."

We can change the proposed resolution of GF#14726 to this, if there is agreement. The plan is to vote on this in the block on the Main Vocab call next Thursday (2/22).

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Feb 13 2018 at 09:16):

I'm happy with that


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC