Stream: terminology
Topic: Can't find what I think is a V3 value set?
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 29 2018 at 23:06):
I have an OID for a value set that as far as I can tell should be a V3 value set (the VSAC indicates the steward is "HL7 Terminology"): https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.114222.4.11.3591/expansion
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 29 2018 at 23:06):
But I can't find the definition for it anywhere in the HL7 Terminology Database or in the FHIR value sets.
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 29 2018 at 23:07):
I can't use an OID for the valueSet uri in the definition (the build tooling fails saying it can't find the valueset), which makes sense, but I don't know what to use for the URL?
Grahame Grieve (Nov 29 2018 at 23:35):
agree it's not in the v3 termnologies.
Grahame Grieve (Nov 29 2018 at 23:36):
it's in the CCDA terminology set, which is not yet supported by the FHIR tooling, because it's not published as part of UTG yet. Coming next year
Grahame Grieve (Nov 29 2018 at 23:36):
Grahame Grieve (Nov 29 2018 at 23:36):
that's the UTG definition. where do you want to use it?
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 29 2018 at 23:50):
In QI-Core, I want to bind the type element of the qicore-coverage profile.
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 29 2018 at 23:50):
I've stubbed it in the hedis-ig, but it's a hack
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 29 2018 at 23:50):
I can do that same hack in QI-Core, but I'm trying to figure out what the right way to do it is.
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 29 2018 at 23:51):
Can I just reference it by it's VSAC url? (https://cts.nlm.nih.gov/fhir/ValueSet/2.16.840.1.114222.4.11.3591)
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 30 2018 at 00:30):
So I tried that and it works with the build tooling (and links to the VSAC to download the value set, which is great!): http://build.fhir.org/ig/cqframework/qi-core/StructureDefinition-qicore-coverage-definitions.html#Coverage.type
Bryn Rhodes (Nov 30 2018 at 00:30):
Let me know if that's not the right approach
Grahame Grieve (Nov 30 2018 at 00:57):
yes that will work for now
Robert McClure (Dec 03 2018 at 16:13):
@Bryn Rhodes So far as SD (CCDA stewards) is concerned,, at the present moment VSAC is the source of truth for the CCDA value sets (that they can publish) and given that they currently publish the one you need, and they make it available via a FHIR API, without specifically thinking this through this has defined the canonical URI/URL for the value set and you've found it. Once UTG get's involved we'll have some interesting discussions on how all this might change, if at all. Graham knows I have a bit of angst about this.
Grahame Grieve (Dec 03 2018 at 19:32):
you have angst about everything...
Bryn Rhodes (Dec 04 2018 at 06:49):
Thanks for confirming Rob.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
