Stream: terminology
Topic: CTS2 on FHIR?
Lin Zhang (Apr 01 2021 at 11:09):
Is there such an effort out there?
Frank Oemig (Apr 01 2021 at 11:46):
Should be because with CTS2 really makes sense. FHIR can be treated as an ITS for CTS2..
Lin Zhang (Apr 01 2021 at 13:26):
Well, I agree. But I mean more coverage of the requirements specified/implied by CTS2.
Michael Lawley (Apr 07 2021 at 01:09):
Can you explain in more detail what you're looking for?
Lin Zhang (Apr 07 2021 at 08:49):
@Michael Lawley Actually, it's a more general version of my question about treating concepts as stand-a-lone Resource to provide more supports for basic/minimum terminology management requirements. Thanks.
Robert McClure (Apr 08 2021 at 23:48):
Ask @Carol Macumber if a more current project would be Guidelines for a Standardized Terminology Knowledge base Project
Lin Zhang (Apr 09 2021 at 00:54):
@Robert McClure Thanks a lot.
Carol Macumber (Apr 09 2021 at 18:18):
CTS2 is an architecture for terminology management that supports history retrieval, though it does not support an
arbitrarily granular change set model for versioning. The Terminology Knowledge Architecture (Tinkar) described in the Standardized Terminology Knowledgebase Informative Document (planned to be balloted in May), in contrast, provides that every new assertion, whether a new component or a change to an existing component, must have a precise version coordinate that govern granular change control. CTS2 asserts a specific terminology model, and does not support unanticipated properties with a self-describing model. So...it is more current project, intending to work alongside existing HL7 efforts. @Lin Zhang we encourage you to read the pre-release ballot content, or the ballot content when it is released. Also, please feel free to join our biweekly calls (listed in the HL7 conference call center)
Lin Zhang (Apr 10 2021 at 04:28):
@Carol Macumber Appreciate it. I'll read it:blush:
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
