Stream: genomics
Topic: somatic variant reporting
Bob Dolin (Apr 28 2021 at 00:19):
@Patrick Werner , @May Terry I've probably asked you this before, but I don't understand why some of our example reports only show c.HGVS and p.HGVS. For instance, this example [http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/genomics-reporting/Bundle-oncology-report-example.html] includes a variant for FBXW7 (NM_001349798.2:c.1394G>A). Presumably this is a NGS test, where a genomic variant was detected. The FBXW7 gene has multiple transcripts. Why did the lab specifically show this c.HGVS and p.HGVS?
Bob Dolin (Apr 28 2021 at 00:30):
and a corollary question - in this example [http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/genomics-reporting/Bundle-oncology-diagnostic.html], there is a genomic BRAF variant, and a single protein variant. Why, amongst all the BRAF transcripts, was only this protein variant included?
Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 10:12):
Bob Dolin said:
Patrick Werner , May Terry I've probably asked you this before, but I don't understand why some of our example reports only show c.HGVS and p.HGVS. For instance, this example [http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/genomics-reporting/Bundle-oncology-report-example.html] includes a variant for FBXW7 (NM_001349798.2:c.1394G>A). Presumably this is a NGS test, where a genomic variant was detected. The FBXW7 gene has multiple transcripts. Why did the lab specifically show this c.HGVS and p.HGVS?
Hi Bob, i'm not 100% if i understood the question correctly.
Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 10:12):
Was the question why they ended up reporting it with this specific transcript?
Bob Dolin (May 06 2021 at 13:51):
Thanks @Patrick Werner . Yes. Let's say I do NGS and detect NC_000001.11:g.1014228G>A. I could report ENST00000624697.4:c.224G>A and p.Ser75Asn, or I could report ENST00000649529.1:c.248G>A and p.Ser83Asn. I was curious how a lab decides which to report - is it, for instance, based on transcript prevalence, based on what form is typically annotated, etc?
Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:23):
I think this has something todo with https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/MANE/
Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:26):
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/376427/
Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:26):
here you can see the different transcripts and which one is the mane transcript
Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:26):
but i'm no expert.
Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:27):
just my experience, i'll try to ask somebody from the lab
Bob Dolin (May 07 2021 at 01:10):
@Patrick Werner Thanks for the pointer to MANE. I hadn't seen that before.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC