FHIR Chat · somatic variant reporting · genomics

Stream: genomics

Topic: somatic variant reporting


view this post on Zulip Bob Dolin (Apr 28 2021 at 00:19):

@Patrick Werner , @May Terry I've probably asked you this before, but I don't understand why some of our example reports only show c.HGVS and p.HGVS. For instance, this example [http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/genomics-reporting/Bundle-oncology-report-example.html] includes a variant for FBXW7 (NM_001349798.2:c.1394G>A). Presumably this is a NGS test, where a genomic variant was detected. The FBXW7 gene has multiple transcripts. Why did the lab specifically show this c.HGVS and p.HGVS?

view this post on Zulip Bob Dolin (Apr 28 2021 at 00:30):

and a corollary question - in this example [http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/genomics-reporting/Bundle-oncology-diagnostic.html], there is a genomic BRAF variant, and a single protein variant. Why, amongst all the BRAF transcripts, was only this protein variant included?

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 10:12):

Bob Dolin said:

Patrick Werner , May Terry I've probably asked you this before, but I don't understand why some of our example reports only show c.HGVS and p.HGVS. For instance, this example [http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/genomics-reporting/Bundle-oncology-report-example.html] includes a variant for FBXW7 (NM_001349798.2:c.1394G>A). Presumably this is a NGS test, where a genomic variant was detected. The FBXW7 gene has multiple transcripts. Why did the lab specifically show this c.HGVS and p.HGVS?

Hi Bob, i'm not 100% if i understood the question correctly.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 10:12):

Was the question why they ended up reporting it with this specific transcript?

view this post on Zulip Bob Dolin (May 06 2021 at 13:51):

Thanks @Patrick Werner . Yes. Let's say I do NGS and detect NC_000001.11:g.1014228G>A. I could report ENST00000624697.4:c.224G>A and p.Ser75Asn, or I could report ENST00000649529.1:c.248G>A and p.Ser83Asn. I was curious how a lab decides which to report - is it, for instance, based on transcript prevalence, based on what form is typically annotated, etc?

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:23):

I think this has something todo with https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/MANE/

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:26):

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/376427/

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:26):

here you can see the different transcripts and which one is the mane transcript

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:26):

but i'm no expert.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Werner (May 06 2021 at 17:27):

just my experience, i'll try to ask somebody from the lab

view this post on Zulip Bob Dolin (May 07 2021 at 01:10):

@Patrick Werner Thanks for the pointer to MANE. I hadn't seen that before.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC