Stream: fmg
Topic: vocab tickets
John Moehrke (Oct 08 2019 at 19:59):
How should we dispose of gForge tickets that are addressed by vocabulary harmonization and updating of the terminology server? For example GF#19311. This has in august been included in v3 vocab, and now that vocab is in the FHIR terminology server; thus it is solved now in FHIR through no action of mine.
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 08 2019 at 21:01):
If it's already dealt with, just withdraw it
John Moehrke (Oct 08 2019 at 21:22):
that works in the one case where I am the submitter... but imagine one where I am not the submitter.
Grahame Grieve (Oct 08 2019 at 22:43):
then find it not persuasive with an explanation
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 09 2019 at 02:03):
Or find it persuasive and then mark it as "applied" with rather than "change required"
Grahame Grieve (Oct 09 2019 at 02:20):
I won't be on the call this week
David Hay (Oct 09 2019 at 04:13):
You do appreciate that standing policy is to assign all particularly difficult actions to FMG members that are not present on the call?
Grahame Grieve (Oct 09 2019 at 04:16):
standing policy is to ignore action items anyway
David Hay (Oct 09 2019 at 05:08):
Well, there is some truth in that...
David Hay (Oct 09 2019 at 05:09):
(for co-chairs especially)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
