FHIR Chat · isModifier · fmg

Stream: fmg

Topic: isModifier


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Mar 15 2017 at 22:31):

is changing isModifier a substantiative change? I'm not entirely sure that it is

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Mar 15 2017 at 22:32):

it's just documentation, right?

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Mar 15 2017 at 22:32):

It effects the reference implementations, so I think so.

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Mar 15 2017 at 22:32):

(as its in the metadata)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Mar 15 2017 at 22:34):

so is documentation...

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Mar 15 2017 at 22:39):

I actually checked the dotnet implementation, and we don't actually epose it (I thought we did) so that does confirm for me enought that's its just documentation

view this post on Zulip Paul Knapp (Apr 05 2017 at 09:38):

I think changing isModifier would be substantive as it is a conformance item - its presence or absence may change the behaviour of an application.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 05 2017 at 13:31):

Agree - but I don't think there's a plan to change that for anything right now?

view this post on Zulip Paul Knapp (Apr 06 2017 at 06:07):

No idea, I was answering Grahame's question at the top.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC