Stream: fmg
Topic: Tools Implementation Guide
Grahame Grieve (Jan 21 2020 at 19:55):
In our various publication tooling, we've defined a number of extensions to handle edge cases, custom behaviour, and cross-version stuff. . Here's a list:
Grahame Grieve (Jan 21 2020 at 19:56):
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/profile-spreadsheet
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/logical-spreadsheet
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/conceptmap-source-cardinality
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/conceptmap-source-name
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/conceptmap-source-type
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/conceptmap-target-cardinality
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/conceptmap-target-type
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/igpublisher-spreadsheet
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/logical-mapping-prefix
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/logical-mapping-suffix
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/resource-information
- http://hl7.org/fhir/tools/StructureDefinition/ig-parameter
Grahame Grieve (Jan 21 2020 at 19:57):
I think it's past time that we defined these formally. The natural way to do this is via a FHIR IG published at http://hl7.org/fhir/tools. Would this be a formal IG that FMG needs to approve?
Grahame Grieve (Jan 21 2020 at 19:58):
it would not be balloted....
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 21 2020 at 20:01):
I think the biggest question would be the change management process. If any of these are something external apps might make use of, we need to have a managed change process. If they're only for tools maintained by HL7 itself, I think we can be more lax.
David Hay (Jan 21 2020 at 20:04):
Sounds that it might be safer to follow the process. Introducing exceptions is always tricky...
Grahame Grieve (Jan 21 2020 at 20:08):
follow what process?
David Hay (Jan 21 2020 at 20:09):
an IG proposal I assume...
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
