Stream: fmg
Topic: Tomorrow's call
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 24 2018 at 21:54):
Do we have anything urgent? David's unavailable to chair and I'll have to head to the airport 15 minutes into the call. I can continue to chair for 30 minutes after that while in transit, but it's simpler to cancel if we don't have anything urgent.
Grahame Grieve (Apr 24 2018 at 21:54):
I don't have anything except the process issue around normative contnetn
Grahame Grieve (Apr 24 2018 at 21:54):
I won't be joining any more calls before the meeting
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 24 2018 at 21:55):
Process issue isn't really an issue - we just need to let WGs know they're allowed to consider non-ballot tracker items that might lead to substantive change - no?
Grahame Grieve (Apr 24 2018 at 21:55):
well, yes, but any substantiative changes that arise this way must go through re-ballot
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 24 2018 at 21:59):
Any substantive changes that arrive in any way must go through re-ballot
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 24 2018 at 22:01):
Essentially the only difference between balloted and non-balloted comments is that the WG is under obligation to reconcile the balloted ones. However, from a good/reasonable practice perspective, they're effectively obligated to resolve all comments that could result in substantive change received before whatever cutoff we set for Aug. ballot prep.
Grahame Grieve (Apr 24 2018 at 22:03):
so I think that we should point this on on co-chairs list since at least one committee has not twigged to their obligations here
Anne Wizauer (Apr 25 2018 at 16:30):
Just a note that Austin is planning to attend the beginning of the call with some issues from SGB this morning.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
