FHIR Chat · Resource proposals · fmg

Stream: fmg

Topic: Resource proposals


view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 25 2017 at 22:43):

There are quite a few resource proposals that still show as draft on the wiki that reflect resources in the current spec:
Have gone through ballot: Consent, DeviceUseStatement, PractitionerRole, RequestGroup, ServiceDefinition

Not balloted: AdverseEvent, Study (ResearchStudy)
, StudyParticipation (ResearchSubject), MessageDefinition, GraphDefinition, TestReport

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 25 2017 at 22:45):

For the non-balloted ones, we need to at least confirm if we're comfortable having them in the spec as draft. For the balloted ones, we need to decide if we want them to be constrained to FMM 0

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 25 2017 at 22:50):

We also have a number of "complex data types" that haven't formally been endorsed by FMG - or at least that I don't see a record of: ContactDetail
Contributor
DataRequirement
Dosage
ExtensionDefinition
ParameterDefinition
RelatedArtifact
TriggerDefinition
UsageContext

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Feb 26 2017 at 00:45):

Where on the wiki is PractitionerRole draft? I thought I'd been through all the correct actions for that.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 26 2017 at 00:54):

You may have been - it's possible the wiki isn't up-to-date. Link is here: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Category:Pending_FHIR_Resource_Proposal

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (Feb 26 2017 at 00:55):

Thanks, it was approved on the last (or one before) FMG call.

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 26 2017 at 04:29):

If you can find it in the minutes, feel free to update the status of that one (and any others covered by the same call). I actually thought a few of the others had been approved too, but I'm not sure.

view this post on Zulip John Moehrke (Feb 27 2017 at 14:25):

The "Consent" one you find is "Consent Tracker". We have "Consent" already approved. It is not categorized correctly, as it is right now categorized as a profile. But we approved it as a Resource. It just started life as a profile.

view this post on Zulip Anne Wizauer (Mar 01 2017 at 14:11):

PractionerRole was approved contingent upon WG approval; since we didn't have a date as of yet, I didn't mark it approved.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC