Stream: fmg
Topic: New QA requirement?
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 15 2020 at 00:34):
Sarah suggested we should have a rule requiring at least one example per profile in the IG. That seems like an excellent minimum requirement to me and pretty essential to IG understanding. It's also a good way to flush out errors with profiles. I'd like us to discuss making this a firm QA requirement for going to ballot or publication - at least for any artifact that isn't draft.
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 15 2020 at 00:35):
I'd also like to talk about how we want authors to track maturity level criteria verification for their artifacts (seeing as my discussion topic on chat.fhir.org gleaned no responses).
Grahame Grieve (Jan 15 2020 at 00:41):
I
Grahame Grieve (Jan 15 2020 at 00:45):
I should alredy make warnings in qa.html for this
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 15 2020 at 00:48):
You don't. I know we used to have warnings about not having examples that covered every data element in the core spec, but those got tossed because no-one paid attention to them.
John Moehrke (Jan 15 2020 at 00:49):
I did.
Grahame Grieve (Jan 15 2020 at 00:57):
the IG Publisher will from the next release
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 15 2020 at 01:06):
As a warning or an error?
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 15 2020 at 01:07):
Might be best as a warning - we can ensure it's not suppressed inappropriately, but there may be certain profiles where it wouldn't make sense or be useful to have an example. E.g. abstract profiles.
Lloyd McKenzie (Jan 15 2020 at 01:07):
Or profiles that are themselves examples
Grahame Grieve (Jan 15 2020 at 01:14):
warning
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
