Stream: fmg
Topic: May ballot for IGs
John Moehrke (Mar 26 2019 at 16:20):
A question came up today (eLTSS) on how ballot comments will be managed relative to the IG ballot.
1. Will gForge be available to be used, or will we be switching to JIRA?
2. How will ballot comments be reflected into gForge if the commenter didn't directly enter them there?
3. Can gForge be used for committee formal reconcilliation? Meaning will there be support to provide dispsition output reporting as needed by HL7 governance?
4. If not using gForge, will there be a way to export gForge into spreadsheet?
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 26 2019 at 16:52):
1. This ballot will use gForge. Testing of Jira will be happening in April.
2. Ballot comments will be imported into gForge from spreadsheets if balloters don't put the comments into gForge directly. We strongly prefer that comments be entered into Jira and the ballot spreadsheet only references the comment numbers and the votes (affirmative or negative). Note that for a gForge item to be considered as a ballot item, it MUST be referenced by a spreadsheet submitted to the ballot desktop.
3. For FHIR, gForge must be used for formal reconciliation
4. There's a transform that allows extracting ballot comments and creating a reconciliation spreadsheet for posting to the ballot desktop once reconciliation is complete.
John Moehrke (Mar 26 2019 at 17:09):
thanks... (Love the Freudian slip in your response to #2, slipping in prefer Jira...)
Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 26 2019 at 18:00):
Indeed :)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
