Stream: fmg
Topic: Issue for FMG discussion
Grahame Grieve (Feb 01 2020 at 00:49):
#FHIR-25564 raises a new question for us - who owns the conversion maps?
David Hay (Feb 01 2020 at 05:23):
FHIR-I ?
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 01 2020 at 05:31):
Probably - shouldn't be FMG
Grahame Grieve (Feb 01 2020 at 05:38):
they own them all?
David Hay (Feb 01 2020 at 06:11):
I think I see what you're getting at - should the committees that own the resources also own the conversion maps. Perhaps with technical assistance...
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 01 2020 at 08:11):
Aka "Grahame writes them all"? If the work groups were meaningfully involved in the creation and could evaluate feedback, then maybe. But I don't believe that's the case.
Grahame Grieve (Feb 01 2020 at 08:35):
Well, a few people helped me. So on the one hand, the committees are not familiar with the language but they own the content problem the language is describing
Grahame Grieve (Feb 19 2020 at 22:15):
Item for discussion at the next meeting: (@Anne Wizauer): we need to clearly document our position with regard to use of SNOMED CT in HL7 published IGs.
Grahame Grieve (Feb 19 2020 at 22:22):
nearest is https://wiki.hl7.org/FHIR_Vocabulary_binding_for_Authors - needs migrating to confluence and a working over
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
