Stream: fmg
Topic: IDMP resources
Grahame Grieve (Dec 12 2018 at 23:19):
@Lloyd McKenzie I believe we agreed in FMG that the IDMP resources would get some kind of status notice, but this has not happened yet?
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 12 2018 at 23:36):
Did we agree on the text of the notice?
Grahame Grieve (Dec 13 2018 at 00:03):
I'm not sure that we did. BR&R was supposed to do it?
Grahame Grieve (Dec 13 2018 at 00:43):
I propose a variant of the warning here: build.fhir.org/iteminstance.html:
Grahame Grieve (Dec 13 2018 at 00:43):
This resource is still undergoing development and review by the appropriate Workgroups. At this time, is considered only as a draft resource proposal not suitable for implementation
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 13 2018 at 01:42):
I'm pretty sure BR&R is not going to be happy with that, but agree it's FMG position.
Grahame Grieve (Dec 13 2018 at 02:20):
is ItemInstance in the right category on the resource list page?
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 13 2018 at 02:22):
No. It should go under Entities
Grahame Grieve (Dec 13 2018 at 02:26):
ok. I want to split entities into 2, to use less vertical space, and use the 5th column. suggestions?
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 13 2018 at 02:27):
ItemInstance shouldn't be there.
Grahame Grieve (Dec 13 2018 at 02:28):
?
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 13 2018 at 02:30):
Posted in the wrong stream. ItemInstance was approved to be dropped from the publication by OO on Nov. 15
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 13 2018 at 02:31):
We could separate Entities into Physical Entities and Other Entities. (Latter holding the first 3)
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
