Stream: fmg
Topic: From OO re: R5 ballot
Josh Mandel (Sep 23 2021 at 15:14):
Report from OO (thanks Hans!) is they are looking at:
-
taking Device normative (certain elements), but unclear if this is ready in the Jan timeframe. Would like to do more connectathon testing to get there.
-
maybe taking Specimen normative (certain elements), but unclear if this is ready in the Jan timeframe. Would like to do more connectathon testing to get there.
-
some changes to Observation in R5 to introduce richer support for specimens + devices (currently backed by normative elements)
-
increasing maturity of NutritionOrder
... all of these would benefit from more connectathon testing; none is a sure thing as of today.
Josh Mandel (Sep 23 2021 at 16:00):
Also for discussion: we're seeing the pain of normative resources with 0..1 elements that really should have been 0..*. Perhaps as new resources are designed and as existing resources climb up the maturity scale, we should be asking editors to bias toward allowing 0..* by default, unless they can robustly reject the possibility that they will ever want more than one element in a slot.
John Moehrke (Sep 23 2021 at 16:31):
had I known OO was going to be asked this, I would have been there to promote DocumentReference. This has had extensive testing in both US-Core and IHE. And has signrficant implementations in the EHR vendors
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
