Stream: fmg
Topic: FMM requirements
Josh Mandel (May 12 2016 at 14:48):
When we say that resources have been successfully tested, for example at a Connectathon, should we also require that they have been successfully tested by someone who did not write the resources in the first place? In other words, an independent third-party was able to understand the specification?
Grahame Grieve (May 12 2016 at 15:21):
y. a connectathon stream that only involves the authors does not count
Josh Mandel (May 12 2016 at 15:22):
OK. We haven't said this.
Grahame Grieve (May 12 2016 at 15:25):
probably should.
Grahame Grieve (May 12 2016 at 15:53):
this task: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=10011 - can we fast track this today please
Grahame Grieve (May 12 2016 at 15:54):
+ question from OO: how do we handle updates to FMM levels that are not associated with publication
John Moehrke (May 12 2016 at 16:01):
Given our FMM requires three independent implementations, this tends to already assure that implementations are not only from the authors hands. -- that is all we have needed to do in IHE (which is no guarantee it works for FHIR).
Grahame Grieve (May 12 2016 at 16:03):
yes. that's true. we just considered a connectathon track with 2 participants, both authors. 3 would usually push us past that
Grahame Grieve (May 12 2016 at 16:04):
......... but not every time
Lloyd McKenzie (May 12 2016 at 17:34):
So are we saying 3 participants, at least one not involved in crafting the spec, or at least 3 not involved in crafting the spec?
Josh Mandel (May 12 2016 at 17:54):
I was thinking at least 2 not involved (i.e. two people who didn't write the spec can use it together).
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
