Stream: fmg
Topic: Ballot Process
Grahame Grieve (Apr 05 2018 at 00:56):
I would like to clarify with the TSC that the addition of new features (clearly) marked as Trial use or Draft in content marked as normative ballot is not a substantive change that requires reballoting.
Grahame Grieve (Apr 05 2018 at 00:57):
with the obvious proviso that these must be features that the normative parts do not rely on or that implementations of the normative parts are not impacted by the new trial-use or draft parts
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 05 2018 at 04:39):
I think the technical argument there would be that the scope of the normative ballot excludes the Draft/STU content, so adding additional ignorable Draft/STU content doesn't change the scope of the normative spec.
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 05 2018 at 04:39):
(So I'm supportive)
Lynn Laakso (Feb 16 2022 at 21:38):
How or where should the ballot sequence (e.g. STU2, in package-list.json) and version (1.1.0-ballot) guidance be documented? And exactly what do we want to say? There is https://confluence.hl7.org/display/FHIR/Implementation+Guide+Parameters and https://confluence.hl7.org/display/FHIR/FHIR+IG+PackageList+doco, to start.
Grahame Grieve (Feb 17 2022 at 05:30):
@Lynn Laakso I updated the doco here: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/FHIR/HL7+Process+for+Publishing+a+FHIR+IG
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
