Stream: cda to fhir
Topic: CDA "Left Hand Side" participations
Richard Kavanagh (Apr 12 2016 at 08:55):
On the CDA model there are many participations on the left hand side that are not directly included within the Composition resource. I assume to support these then extensions would be required.
Richard Kavanagh (Apr 12 2016 at 09:00):
Specifically I am referring to
- dataEnterer
- participant (the generic one)
Richard Kavanagh (Apr 12 2016 at 09:00):
For the "generic" participant what would be the correct approach for dealing with 'particiant.functionCode' ?
Lloyd McKenzie (Apr 12 2016 at 15:38):
Some of those might end up being handled by Provenance
Grahame Grieve (Apr 15 2016 at 02:28):
ping
Josh Mandel (Apr 15 2016 at 02:30):
Back -- zulip's VM ran out of hard disk space (it only has 8GB, and logs got to ~2GB)
Grahame Grieve (Apr 15 2016 at 02:30):
great thanks
Josh Mandel (Apr 15 2016 at 02:30):
We need monitoring processes in place. And automatic log rotation. And a bigger drive. :-)
Grahame Grieve (Apr 15 2016 at 02:31):
can we change any of those things now?
Josh Mandel (Apr 15 2016 at 02:31):
(Moving convo to private with @Hussain Chinoy )
Grahame Grieve (Apr 15 2016 at 02:31):
k
Oliver Egger (Oct 04 2016 at 14:16):
Reopening the CDA "Left Hand Side" participations topic: the dataEnter is not included within the Composition, and a provenance resource in a document bundle "are Provenance Resources that have a target which is a resource included in the composition" (http://www.hl7.org/fhir/documents.html). Does that not mean that the dataEnterer has to be an extension since there is no Provenance Resource possible for a composition?
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 04 2016 at 16:45):
Are you wanting the Provenance to point at the Composition resource or to the document Bundle?
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 04 2016 at 16:46):
The former should be straight-forward. We may need to add guidance on how to accomplish the latter
Oliver Egger (Oct 04 2016 at 17:42):
In case of mapping dataEnterer I would have thought the former (Composition resource), so "target which is a resource included in the composition" would include the composition itself too?
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 04 2016 at 18:42):
I *think* that wording should be changed to say "included in the document", because in general nothing gets included in the Composition - just referenced by.
Grahame Grieve (Oct 04 2016 at 19:30):
yes that's an error in the wording there
Oliver Egger (Oct 06 2016 at 20:45):
thanks for clarification, submitted GF#12229
Grahame Grieve (Oct 06 2016 at 20:45):
thx
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
