FHIR Chat · US Core Encounter.hospitalization · united states

Stream: united states

Topic: US Core Encounter.hospitalization


view this post on Zulip Alex McManus (Mar 09 2022 at 15:03):

Inferno currently shows validation warnings for compliance issues with ambulatory encounters... "Could not verify presence of the following must support elements: hospitalization, hospitalization.dischargeDisposition" So my question is, do we need to run inferno against at least one hospital encounter for this test to pass? What is the expectation for ambulatory practices/EHRs? And will certification allow for multiple inferno runs against hospital vs ambulatory practices to certify or do we need one all encompassing test passing?

view this post on Zulip Cooper Thompson (Mar 09 2022 at 15:18):

This seems like an issue with US Core. Can you submit a Jira against US Core to remove MS from hospitalization.dischargeDisposition? We have a newish process where if that Jira is accepted and flagged as being a patch to 3.1.1, ONC can recognize that as a "clarification". Then Inferno can update their check.

view this post on Zulip Cooper Thompson (Mar 09 2022 at 15:18):

FYI @Eric Haas @Brett Marquard

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (Mar 09 2022 at 16:15):

Presume that only works for issues that don't affect cardinality or data type? (E.g. the fact 3.1.1 doesn't allow PractitionerReference some places where that wasn't intentional)

view this post on Zulip Yunwei Wang (Mar 09 2022 at 18:11):

So my question is, do we need to run inferno against at least one hospital encounter for this test to pass?

Yes
Inferno allows server implementer provides multiple patient ids to cover all test cases


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC