FHIR Chat · Reporting minor typo's and inconsistencies in mapping tables · v2 to FHIR

Stream: v2 to FHIR

Topic: Reporting minor typo's and inconsistencies in mapping tables


view this post on Zulip David McKillop (Mar 15 2022 at 05:52):

I've found the mapping tables associated with each resource quire useful and wondered what the best option was to have minor typo's and inconsistencies fixed - I'm assuming "Change request" for each resource would be the way to do it, but just wanted to confirm.
For example:
For the ServiceRequest V2 mappings :

  • "priority" has "TQ1.9" but I think it should be "TQ.6"
  • " performerType" has "RF!-3", but it should be "RF1-3"

For Observation V2 mappings (and similar inconsistencies in other resources) where the separator between segment and segment number is either a hypen (-) or a dot (.):

  • "identifier" description has both "OBX.21" and "OBX-21"
  • "performer" has both "OBX.15" and OBX-16"

I'm assuming the hypen (-) is the correct term, but just to clarify hypens (-) are used to separate segments and their respective field numbers and dots (.) are used to separate data types and their respective elements?

view this post on Zulip Riki Merrick (Mar 15 2022 at 14:49):

You are correct, that - should be used for the field and . should be used for component - we will need to update those mappings to be consistent (would you mind adding a jira for each resource, where you find it?).

view this post on Zulip Riki Merrick (Mar 15 2022 at 14:50):

As far as the identified mappings: priority should be TQ1-9, you are correct about the typo of! instead of 1.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC