Stream: v2 to FHIR
Topic: HL7 to FHIR resource mapping
Aditya Pulekar (Dec 13 2019 at 17:53):
Hello, I'm working on a prototype that requires mapping of HL7 message components to standard FHIR resources. I was looking to map PV17 & PV117 to an appropriate FHIR resource property. Currently, I'm treating both as 'EpisodeOfCare.careManager.Practitioner.name'. I would like these two components to be referenced by two different FHIR resource properties. Any suggestions?
Aditya Pulekar (Dec 13 2019 at 17:55):
Just FYI, PV17 is 'Attending Doctor' & PV117 is 'Admitting Doctor'
Craig Newman (Dec 13 2019 at 18:02):
The v2-to-FHIR project (https://confluence.hl7.org/display/OO/2-To-FHIR+Project) is developing a set of standard (as a starting point) set of mappings (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PaFYPSSq4oplTvw_4OgOn6h2Bs_CMvCAU9CqC4tPBgk/edit#gid=484860251). We currently map PV1 to Encounter rather than EpisodeOfCare.
It looks like EpisodeOfCare.team(CareTeam.participant) would let you list multiple providers giving each one a role (attending, admitting, etc). EpisodeOfCare.careManager doesn't look like it's allowed to repeat, so that'll be a problem if both PV1-17 and -17 are populated.
Aditya Pulekar (Dec 13 2019 at 18:15):
Thanks @Craig Newman !! I feel 'Encounter.participant' should also work in my case. I should be able to list multiple participants with individual roles.
Craig Newman (Dec 13 2019 at 18:36):
If you're heavily involved and/or interested in v2 to FHIR transformations, please consider joining the project's weekly calls and contributing your experience.
Aditya Pulekar (Dec 13 2019 at 18:52):
@Craig Newman Sure :+1: How do I get myself added or get notified to the event?
Frank Oemig (Dec 14 2019 at 11:01):
Please go to the conference call website on hl7.org and browse for v2-FHIR mapping.
Craig Newman (Dec 16 2019 at 15:56):
As well, all calls are on the HL7 Conference Call Center (http://www.hl7.org/concalls/Default.aspx). You can filter on all Orders and Observations calls and find them a little more easily.
Aditya Pulekar (Dec 16 2019 at 19:17):
Sure, thanks!
Kevin Mayfield (Dec 18 2019 at 11:16):
Can I just say a big thanks to those involved in the mapping. I finding it very useful
Craig Newman (Dec 18 2019 at 12:49):
@Kevin Mayfield you are very welcome. As you use the preliminary mappings, please provide any feedback to Hans or me. We want to make sure the mappings seem accurate but we also want to know if they are consistent, if the format of the mappings is understandable (although spreadsheets are unlikely to be the final format), if you are running into any other gotchas (Task creation, provenance, etc), or anything else you come across. Thanks.
Kevin Mayfield (Dec 18 2019 at 14:13):
Yes will do. Most problems have been on fhir side at present.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
