FHIR Chat · Normative? · ontology

Stream: ontology

Topic: Normative?


view this post on Zulip Renato Iannella (May 11 2016 at 06:26):

Hi, I am trying to determine which description of the FHIR/RDF/Ontology deliveravbles is the latest and/or on the normative track.

So far I can see:
https://hl7-fhir.github.io/rdf
http://w3c.github.io/hcls-fhir-rdf/spec/rdf.html
http://w3c.github.io/hcls-fhir-rdf/spec/ontology.html
http://w3c.github.io/hcls-fhir-rdf/spec/rdf-SBS.html

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 11 2016 at 10:24):

there is no single latest - it's work in progress

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 11 2016 at 10:25):

in the next couple of months Eric and I have to find time to reconcile the content between the two, and update all the documentation for the agreements we've made

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 11 2016 at 10:25):

the only current way to find out what our intent is is to ask us here

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (May 11 2016 at 21:05):

Hi, @Renato Iannella, rdf-SBS is sort of an agenda and cookbook. it's not likely to be the final repo for the spec.

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (May 11 2016 at 21:07):

the spec will live in the individual resources which are automatically generated from code which consumes structure defns and and has all the special cases that we decided on. ultimately, this should be in apparent agreement with rdf-SBS but rdf-SBS is likely to only include the stuff we needed to discuss.

view this post on Zulip Eric Prud'hommeaux (May 11 2016 at 21:08):

ontology will be more about using the ontology, including the use of auxilliary ontologies


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC