Stream: canada
Topic: Reference PractitionerRole as author for DetectedIssue
Maria Hu (Nov 14 2018 at 18:29):
For resource DetectedIssue, can I reference PractitionerRole instead of Practitioner for element author? PractitionerRole contains both organization and location whereas Practitioner doesn't. Am trying to avoid using extension. Please advise, thanks.
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 14 2018 at 18:48):
For R3, not without using an extension - which is a problem with a lot of R3 resources. For R4, that should be true but looks like it's not. I'm going to see if we can sneak that fix in before R4 ships.
Maria Hu (Nov 14 2018 at 19:05):
Great thanks Lloyd !
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 14 2018 at 19:34):
Discussion happening on the #committers stream. Unfortunately it doesn't look like an issolated problem :(
Maria Hu (Nov 14 2018 at 22:00):
Ok thanks for the bad news Lloyd:-/
2nd attempt to avoid using extension ................
What if I apply referencing PractitionerRole for "implicated" element in DetectedIssue? This is in the context of providing organization and location.
Please advise, thanks.
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 14 2018 at 22:28):
That wouldn't be appropriate. "implicated" would say that the PractitionerRole was a cause for the DetectedIssue, which isn't correct. There's no issue using extensions when they're needed. In R3, if you need to reference PractitionerRole instead of Practitioner, extension is generally the correct way to do it.
Maria Hu (Nov 15 2018 at 00:30):
ok thanks for the clarifications
Maria Hu (Nov 27 2018 at 17:00):
ok thanks Lloyd. ImmunizationEvaluation is in v4, we're still in v3.
Lloyd McKenzie (Nov 27 2018 at 17:02):
Then you'd be looking at doseStatus and doseStatusReason, not status
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
