FHIR Chat · Vocab topics · conformance

Stream: conformance

Topic: Vocab topics


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 28 2016 at 00:05):

@Rob Hausam - do we have any open vocab issues that need resolving before ballot?

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (May 28 2016 at 00:06):

I'm not sure that we do, but I should check - I'll do that

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (May 28 2016 at 00:15):

the only one that I see that's currently open is #10018 - Use v2/v3 aligned vocab for [Patient.]gender
I'll think if there are tracker items that we should add and get taken care of

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 28 2016 at 00:43):

10018 is a question for PA not vocab, no?

view this post on Zulip Lloyd McKenzie (May 28 2016 at 00:58):

Vocab methodology says PA isn't allowed to - all "code"-bound elements must use FHIR-defined vocabularies. The policy is a Vocab issue.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 28 2016 at 01:02):

well, there's 3 questions: alignment - which is not disallowed, using the same codes, and actual direct use of the code system. Only #3 is disallowed

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (May 28 2016 at 02:19):

I'm thinking about how we should decide this - PA (at least representation from the WG) has the specific desire for alignment (which we would generally agree with, I think) and owns the resource
the particular policy regarding a 'code'-bound element is a FHIR methology issue (FHIR-I and/or MnM?) - and I'm not thinking that Vocab WG likely ever has specifically endorsed this? or has the authority to change it?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 28 2016 at 11:38):

no it was a joint decision with vocab in Paris. Wed Q1

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 28 2016 at 11:38):

I don't think we'll quickly change our mind, but PA can change the codes and thir values. I'm not in favour of changing male to M at this stage in the game for a very few people who haven't begun to look at the v2 -> FHIR process

view this post on Zulip Rob Hausam (May 28 2016 at 13:14):

ok, makes sense - your memory on it is clearly much better than mine :)
so it sounds like it should go back to PA, then
and I agree - I'm not in favor of making that change

view this post on Zulip Brian Postlethwaite (May 30 2016 at 01:25):

I'm not keen to change from the current values either.


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC