FHIR Chat · Terminology Server in Validation · conformance

Stream: conformance

Topic: Terminology Server in Validation


view this post on Zulip Keith Boone (Aug 09 2016 at 11:16):

We are having some challenges using validator.jar because of proxy settings in some of our environments. Is there some way to make the Validator completely standalone without standing up a terminology server? For my build environment, I don't really have the option of going to an outside system, and setting up a FHIR server to access information that SHOULD be in the FHIR definitions seems like it might be overkill. Could there be a validator terminology-lite option?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 09 2016 at 12:08):

the validator uses anything in the fhir definitions. But there's no way I can load up Snomed / LOINC etc in process

view this post on Zulip Keith Boone (Aug 09 2016 at 17:42):

So is there any way to do a "Serverless" validation. I have other sources for validating data in code systems, and having to install a Terminology Server in my build environment is a lot of work for the build team.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 09 2016 at 21:05):

not right now but it's a reasonable thing to want to do. if you make a task, I'll get to it

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 15 2016 at 08:11):

the validation for the 1.6.0 frozen version can do validation without a supporting terminology service. To set this up, specify n/a for the terminology server in the command line parameters

view this post on Zulip Keith Boone (Aug 15 2016 at 23:22):

Does it also support validation for pre-1.6 resource packs?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 15 2016 at 23:31):

no. I only made the changes for 1.6

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Aug 15 2016 at 23:31):

what version do you want it for?

view this post on Zulip Alexander Kiel (Sep 04 2019 at 15:21):

Is there a way to specify proxy settings in the validator.jar? I can't find them in the documentation at: https://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Using_the_FHIR_Validator

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Sep 04 2019 at 20:11):

I thought that -proxy address:port would work infrastructurally. I certainly haven't coded that though

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Sep 04 2019 at 20:13):

Turns out I just hadn't done it. I have done it now - will release a new version sometime today


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC