Stream: conformance
Topic: SD dependency management
Chris Grenz (Oct 25 2016 at 14:31):
Because a StructureDefinition snapshot includes information from dependent profiles, how should those dependencies be described and/or managed?
Chris Grenz (Oct 25 2016 at 14:32):
I think there are excellent patterns already in place for package management in Java and .NET (and others) - should we have something similar in the FHIR SD model?
Chris Grenz (Oct 25 2016 at 18:39):
<snapshotDepends> <profile value="http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient" /> <version value="1.0.2" /> </snapshotDepends> <snapshotDepends> <profile value="http://example.com/fhir/StructureDefinition/my-patient-profile" /> <version value="0.2.4-beta2" /> </snapshotDepends>
Grahame Grieve (Oct 25 2016 at 19:08):
unless you want a version range like java. there's certainly real complexity here
Chris Grenz (Oct 26 2016 at 14:11):
I think the complexity is inherent in the snapshot paradigm. Ignoring it doesn't make it less complex...
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC