Stream: conformance
Topic: Message validation
Simone Heckmann (Oct 30 2017 at 12:55):
One thing I dont understand about MessageDefinition: How does this work for message validation? Can validators operate on the def alone or do we need a Bundle profile for that?
Or can the Bundle profile be somehow derived from the MessageDefinition? It seems like a lot of redundant work if we needed to maintain both...
Lloyd McKenzie (Oct 30 2017 at 14:54):
The GraphDefinition should be sufficient to provide full validation - once the validator supports GraphDefinitions...
Grahame Grieve (Oct 30 2017 at 19:16):
hm I should link that up
Brian Postlethwaite (Nov 10 2017 at 04:44):
Damn, another thing my server needs to implement.
Eric Haas (Sep 17 2019 at 19:02):
Do the validators use MessageDefinition or GraphDefinition to check the bundle contents? if not now - future plans?
Ewout Kramer (Sep 17 2019 at 19:51):
Not the .NET one. And it's not on our short-term deliverable list. Which does not mean we wouldn't love a PR to add it ;-)
Lloyd McKenzie (Sep 17 2019 at 20:28):
Java doesn't either. All of my messaging work is with a project using 2016May where neither resource is available or I'd probably have done it already. GraphDefinition is the real chunk of work - and it wouldn't be a minor enhancement. MessageDefinition just points to that or profile, so not much more to add for it.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
