FHIR Chat · Interversion package · conformance

Stream: conformance

Topic: Interversion package


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 24 2019 at 11:52):

I'm working on formal conversions between FHIR versions. I'm gathering all the previously published work into one place, along with new work. The github repo will have:
- concept maps between R2/R3/R4 resource names
- concept maps between R2/R3/R4 search parameters
- structure maps between R2/R3 and R3/R4 resources
- concept maps between R2/R3/R4 codes (as contributed)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 24 2019 at 11:52):

I will generate packages for publication from this set. The question I have is around version; what version should I publish the packages for?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 24 2019 at 11:53):

e.g. I can publish all the maps in R5 syntax (that's the master syntax).

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 24 2019 at 11:55):

I can convert them to other versions, and, say, publish all conversions in all versions a permutational explosion of 9 packages right now, shortly to become 64 (3^3 -> 4^4).

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 24 2019 at 11:55):

or we could publish a subset, only the meaningful combinations... but I don't know what those are?

view this post on Zulip Alexander Zautke (Jul 25 2019 at 21:40):

My preference for the StructureMaps would be the R5 syntax. Shouldn’t be too hard to adapt if you really need it in a different version other than the latest. Could you also publish the mapping files with the concrete syntax separately?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 25 2019 at 21:42):

I will publish them as well

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Jul 25 2019 at 21:43):

but.... if it's just R5, which is a moving syntax... what happens when we start working on R6?

view this post on Zulip Richard Townley-O'Neill (Jul 26 2019 at 02:13):

Maybe publish them in most recent published (R4) and in CI (R5) form.

view this post on Zulip Alexander Zautke (Nov 18 2019 at 20:53):

@Grahame Grieve I was wondering if you had already the time to publish the packages mentioned above? Especially the mapping files, I was thinking of using them to test the parser of the .NET mapping implementation. If not, is there anything I can help with to get these maps published?

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (Nov 18 2019 at 21:07):

funnily enough, working on that now


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC