FHIR Chat · scheduling / Issue #38 Add urgency as an input property · argonaut

Stream: argonaut

Topic: scheduling / Issue #38 Add urgency as an input property


view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 11 2017 at 23:04):

cooperthompson opened Issue #38

Based on PA discussion, we propose adding a priority input property so that the scheduler (patient or staff) can specify if the appointment is emergency/urgent/routine.

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 11 2017 at 23:15):

brettmarquard commented on Issue #38

Will PA create a value set in core we can reuse?

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 12 2017 at 06:54):

brianpos commented on Issue #38

At this point I think we're letting the content be self contained in your IG until we're happy and then promote the whole thing into core.

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (Sep 12 2017 at 21:17):

I meant there is a Appt-type valueset alread in core - not sure why need a new one?

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 27 2017 at 00:22):

Healthedata1 commented on Issue #38

how does this differ from the appt-type parameter? These values are included see:http://build.fhir.org/ig/argonautproject/scheduling/ValueSet-types.html

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 27 2017 at 00:22):

Healthedata1 closed Issue #38

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 27 2017 at 00:22):

Healthedata1 reopened Issue #38

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 27 2017 at 00:24):

Healthedata1 commented on Issue #38

Appt-type has alway seemed to conflate orthogonal concepts to me and is poorly described in all HL7 standards IMO. Although that may reflect the real world...

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 27 2017 at 03:29):

Healthedata1 labeled Issue #38

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Sep 27 2017 at 21:54):

Healthedata1 commented on Issue #38

see #39

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Oct 10 2017 at 22:49):

Healthedata1 commented on Issue #38

Two things I need to understand regarding this issue:

  • Clarifying with WG is this a new element on Appt vs a new search parameter? ( and does that matter)

  • Clarify the Overlap of these concepts with Appt-type as implicitly defined by the Argo Scheduling Value Set:

  • Visit context ( e.g. Routine ) as I believe Appt-type is currently defined in FHIR resources

  • vs a Service type ( e.g. Office Visit ) as I believe is commonly used in scheduling community

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Oct 25 2017 at 17:37):

Healthedata1 commented on Issue #38

Urgency used to prioritize Patients and "bump" decision to defer this issue to future.

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Oct 25 2017 at 17:37):

Healthedata1 closed Issue #38

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Oct 25 2017 at 17:38):

Healthedata1 reopened Issue #38

view this post on Zulip argo-scheduling-bot (Oct 25 2017 at 17:39):

Healthedata1 labeled Issue #38


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC