FHIR Chat · Missing Code System · argonaut

Stream: argonaut

Topic: Missing Code System


view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 21 2018 at 23:54):

At http://www.fhir.org/guides/argonaut/r2/ValueSet-condition-category.xml.html there's a reference to a code system that is not formally defined. In US-Core, it's been formally defined here:

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 21 2018 at 23:54):

http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/ValueSet-us-core-condition-category.html

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 21 2018 at 23:55):

An implementer is asking whether there's any prospect of changing the existing R2 interfaces to use the US-core code system rather than the argonaut one for which no formal definition is provided.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 21 2018 at 23:55):

thoughts?

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (May 21 2018 at 23:59):

It was defined in my build when we authored it but looks like it never got published. I'll add an issue. Also there is no link to your "here"...

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 21 2018 at 23:59):

well, a future version of argonaut would use the US core link I provided, yes?

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (May 22 2018 at 00:04):

I don't know the answer because I have always strictly adhered to the same version for the code system and the valueset when defined in FHIR. USCore codesystems start at STU3 - Based on your question - It sounds like that is not a problem...

view this post on Zulip Eric Haas (May 22 2018 at 02:11):

Here is the original codesystem in the spec. In DSTU2 there was this really sweet way to define the URI so I bunched all the codes into a single codesystem

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 22 2018 at 04:14):

ah.

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 22 2018 at 04:14):

so it's my fault... a broken link....


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC