Stream: smart
Topic: scopes v2 following FHIR interactions
Josh Mandel (Nov 19 2020 at 15:28):
@Dunmail quick follow-up from the Q&A after my SMART presentation Tuesday. I think you'd asked about why we don't more directly follow the FHIR interaction model in our proposed scope system. I wanted to highlight that 1) we do map very closely, providing FHIR resources + interactions + (optionally) search params restricting the grant ,and 2) the main place where we "add" something is our user/ and patient/ prefixes, which don't directly correspond to anything surfaced in the FHIR API, but which are useful in tying together a FHIR authorization with out-side-the-FHIR-realm rules about which records are accessible to which users. I hope this helps; I feel like I didn't answer this live as clearly as I could have.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
