FHIR Chat · hapi-fhir-jpaserver-starter rel_5_4_0

Stream: hapi

Topic: hapi-fhir-jpaserver-starter rel_5_4_0

Sean McIlvenna (May 17 2021 at 21:20):

Anyone planning on updating the hapi-fhir-jpaserver-starter project to be compatible with 5.4.0-PRE-10-SNAPSHOT? Looks like there are a number of classes that are refactored in hapi-fhir:5.4.0-PRE10-SNAPSHOT that aren't yet accounted for in the REL_5_4_0 branch of hapi-fhir-jpaserver-starter

Rob Hausam (May 17 2021 at 21:21):

I just finished doing that in the past 2 days.

Sean McIlvenna (May 17 2021 at 21:22):

Nice! Any chance you'll be doing a commit/push to rel_5_4_0 soon?

Rob Hausam (May 17 2021 at 21:28):

I updated my server instance. But looking more at your question, I may have missed some of what you are referring to about the 5.4.0-PRE-10-SNAPSHOT. Mine is now based on the rel_5_4_0 branch which I merged to my master. Maybe we should chat further about what I should have done.

Rob Hausam (May 17 2021 at 21:28):

My server now reports that it is 5.4.0-PRE2-SNAPSHOT.

Rob Hausam (May 17 2021 at 21:32):

I actually did have a few thoughts about whether those additional updates in the base had been made in hapi-fhir-jpaserver-starter, but I didn't pursue it sufficiently. So, back to the original question, I actually would be interest in seeing that done and would be happy to help with a PR for that.

Rob Hausam (May 17 2021 at 22:26):

This seems to be a downside to having these as separate projects. It's a lot easier for them to get out of sync. But maybe getting them back in sync won't be too bad.

Jens Villadsen (May 18 2021 at 17:38):

Ill take that cost at any time. The starter project IMHO should not be part of the base. The fact that they are separated makes it way easier for newcommers to grasp I believe

Rob Hausam (May 18 2021 at 17:59):

@Jens Villadsen I think you are right. And I didn't mean to imply that it is a big downside - or that I would advocate changing it back. We do need to update jpaserver-starter, though.