Stream: hapi
Topic: Issue with docs on settings tags
Sean McIlvenna (Mar 29 2019 at 18:24):
Regarding this page: http://hapifhir.io/doc_rest_operations.html
There is a statement under "Setting Tags in a Create/Update method" which states: "Note that FHIR specifies that in an update method, any tags supplied by the client are copied to the newly saved version, as well as any tags the existing version had."
I believe this is incorrect. @John Moehrke can you confirm?
Sean McIlvenna (Mar 29 2019 at 18:34):
I also found this:
http://hapifhir.io/doc_tags.html
Which has a broken link to http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/fhir/extras.html#tag
Was hopeful I would find some answers there... then the cursed broken link
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 18:38):
the tags should be no different than any other element. Where in the FHIR spec is this stated? As anywhere this is said needs to be corrected. There are some cases where policy may declare that a change in only the tag is not a change in the lastUpdated, but that is a policy not a mandate.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2019 at 19:19):
the correct link is http://hl7.org/fhir/resource.html#simple-tags
Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2019 at 19:19):
and, in particular, with regard to this question: http://hl7.org/fhir/resource.html#tag-updates
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 19:27):
so then, how does one indicate that they want to replace the security tags with new ones? This is mentioned as the final "However..." sentence
Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2019 at 19:36):
http://hl7.org/fhir/resource-operation-meta-add.html and http://hl7.org/fhir/resource-operation-meta-delete.html
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 19:40):
so those operations are for meta... which is fine and interesting. I am more concerned about the tag-update rules that have special handling for security tags. If all of meta was handled the same way, then it would be more clear.
Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2019 at 19:41):
all of meta is special. the rules are different for different elements in meta
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 19:42):
the tag-update text should reference the $meta operations. right?
Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2019 at 19:43):
that would be useful, yes
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 19:45):
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 19:56):
GF#20631 to kick off security wg discussion
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 19:57):
GF#20632 as there is historic text treating security label as a URI, but it is now a coding
Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2019 at 19:57):
how does it do that?
John Moehrke (Mar 29 2019 at 20:00):
sorry, typo?
Grahame Grieve (Mar 29 2019 at 20:44):
there is historic text treating security label as a URI
how so?
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
