Stream: hapi
Topic: BaseConformance
Grahame Grieve (May 15 2016 at 23:58):
James - BaseConformance is in now.
Grahame Grieve (May 15 2016 at 23:59):
do you think it's worth generating in DSTU2? HAPI uses that yes?
James Agnew (May 16 2016 at 21:19):
Good question... DSTU2 has been around for long enough that I think we're equally likely to break existing code as to help people. @Bryn Rhodes are you working in DSTU2, or just DSTU3?
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 21:39):
I cannot think how it will break code?
James Agnew (May 16 2016 at 22:10):
hmm yeah, you're probably right..
if you do it, i'll sync it into hapi.
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 22:10):
k. I'll let you know
Bryn Rhodes (May 16 2016 at 23:03):
@James Agnew FWIW, we're working against DSTU3.
Grahame Grieve (May 16 2016 at 23:56):
it might break code if you serialise by iterating the properties of named classes, say?
James Agnew (May 17 2016 at 21:29):
Heh, I hope nobody is doing that..... HAPI has an entire API for iterating over the children of things by inspecting the annotations.
Grahame Grieve (May 17 2016 at 21:31):
as long as they know to inspect the super type, not a previously defined type. else introducing an abstract intermediary will screw them over
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
