Stream: implementers
Topic: v3 systems
Michele Mottini (Aug 26 2019 at 13:37):
I see references to a http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ParticipationType (eg at http://hl7.org/fhir/STU3/valueset-security-role-type.html) and a http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType (eg at http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/valueset-security-role-type.html) - with the same codes. Which is the right one? Should they be fixed?
Grahame Grieve (Aug 26 2019 at 13:38):
one is value set, one is code system
Michele Mottini (Aug 26 2019 at 13:41):
ah no, they are both code systems - just spelled slightly differently: one with a dash (.../v3-ParticipationType) and one with a slash (.../v3/ParticipationType)
Michele Mottini (Aug 26 2019 at 13:43):
Michele Mottini (Aug 26 2019 at 13:46):
Or if one is a value set which is the system to use for AUT ?
Rob Hausam (Aug 26 2019 at 14:20):
They are both code system urls, as you say - the first is the url in STU3 and the second is the url in R4. Normally the canonical urls for code systems don't change, but in this case it was felt that the urls or a whole set of HL7 defined and managed code systems needed to be brought in alignment under terminology.hl7.org as we move toward the unified UTG terminology infrastructure (and content when possible) across all of the HL7 standard families (V2, V3/CDA and FHIR). In R4 you use http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType for 'system'. And in STU3 you still use http://hl7.org/fhir/v3/ParticipationType (I just verified that on tx.fhir.org).
Michele Mottini (Aug 26 2019 at 14:30):
Got it, thanks Rob
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
