Stream: implementers
Topic: unbound codes
Nick George (Dec 11 2018 at 17:11):
Hello, I noticed that R4 still has (at least one) top-level code (i.e., not inside a Coding or CodeableConcept) without "required" binding: Sequence.type, http://hl7.org/fhir/2018Sep/sequence.profile.json.html, which uses "example" as binding strength. Should that field be either string or Coding? There was a task https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=15559 that addressed a similar issue in StructureDefinition.type, which was changed to a uri
Lloyd McKenzie (Dec 11 2018 at 17:14):
@Grahame Grieve Can we still fix this?
Kevin Power (Dec 11 2018 at 18:46):
Regarding the question about Sequence (now MolecularSequence) - we updated that binding to required: http://build.fhir.org/molecularsequence-definitions.html#MolecularSequence.type
Nick George (Dec 11 2018 at 19:47):
that would be in a version > 3.5.0?
Grahame Grieve (Dec 11 2018 at 20:01):
yes look in build.fhir.org
Nick George (Dec 11 2018 at 20:19):
I see, so just to be clear, R4 will not be 3.5.0, but some later version?
Grahame Grieve (Dec 11 2018 at 20:42):
build.fhir.org is the R4 candidate
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
