Stream: implementers
Topic: smart-on-fhir in capability statement
Ken Stevens (Feb 11 2021 at 15:32):
The example on https://hl7.org/fhir/smart-app-launch/conformance/index.html#example includes
"system": "http://hl7.org/fhir/restful-security-service",
"code": "SMART-on-FHIR"
Is that the code-system we should be using for this?
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 11 2021 at 15:32):
@Josh Mandel
Ken Stevens (Feb 11 2021 at 15:49):
I see according to http://hl7.org/fhir/valueset-restful-security-service.html it should be http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/restful-security-service
Can someone fix the example on the hl7 site?
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 11 2021 at 15:52):
Can you submit a change request?
Josh Mandel (Feb 11 2021 at 16:24):
We're completing the move away from CapabilityStatement-based discovery in SMARTv2, for what it's worth.
Josh Mandel (Feb 11 2021 at 16:24):
(completed transition to .well-known/smart-configuration)
Ken Stevens (Feb 11 2021 at 17:29):
Lloyd McKenzie said:
Can you submit a change request?
I forget how to do that. Can you do it for me? :-)
ryan moehrke (Feb 11 2021 at 17:35):
I had already opened up a ticket in the smart github for this if that's what you were looking for Lloyd
https://github.com/HL7/smart-app-launch/issues/311
Lloyd McKenzie (Feb 11 2021 at 17:51):
In the end, it'll need to be in Jira, but if it's in their Git, I guess they can propagate it to Jira on your behalf. @Ken Stevens, at the bottom of every FHIR spec page there's a "propose a change" link that takes you to HL7's Jira
Ken Stevens (Feb 11 2021 at 21:31):
Thanks @Josh Mandel . I just confirmed that James has already added support for that new interface.
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
