Stream: implementers
Topic: representing test resources
Eric Haas (May 02 2018 at 23:15):
There is no general extension to indicate a resource is 'test' (v 'prod') - should we be using meta.tag instead?
Brian Reinhold (May 02 2018 at 23:37):
Is the a general extension to indicate a resource is 'test' or should we be using
meta.tag?
THis is actually part of a ballot. But I would think this would be a general classification of Observations. Having such a clear category would allow studies that are sampling say all Observation vital signs for BP to only tabulate real physiological data. I know that I send a lot of test and demo data.
Eric Haas (May 02 2018 at 23:55):
I think I found the answer here : https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/4-implementers/topic/Distinguishing.20test.20patients
Eric Haas (May 03 2018 at 00:12):
Its there in Security tags but I don't see how anyone could find that. I will add a GForge to make this clearer for implementers, Perhaps in a new section on the doc page under 'testing implementations' which currently narrowly scoped to TestScripts/ Test Report. or in the documentation for meta.security
Grahame Grieve (May 05 2018 at 04:46):
sounds like a good idea to add an explicit note
Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC
