FHIR Chat · question about [base]/metadata · implementers

Stream: implementers

Topic: question about [base]/metadata


view this post on Zulip Abbie Watson (May 18 2016 at 18:34):

Hi, we're doing some testing of our Argonaut Sprint 2 server, and a question regarding the /metadata route has come up. Say we have a root_url of http://www.acme.com, and a path of /fhir. Should /metadata be at http://www.acme.com/metadata or http://www.acme.com/fhir/metadata? We implemented it as the former, because I read the Argonaut Sprint 2 spec as to mean that the /metadata route should be at a consistent location relative to the domain; where as the FHIR spec seems to indicate that it should be relative to the [base] url which includes the API path.

ps. sorry for the cross-posting. Still figuring out where the best place to post argonaut implementation questions. :)

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 18 2016 at 18:42):

the latter - it's relative to the stated base, not the domain

view this post on Zulip Grahame Grieve (May 18 2016 at 18:42):

there may be a use for a well-known, but we'd use well known for that

view this post on Zulip Abbie Watson (May 18 2016 at 20:53):

Thanks for clarifying! :)


Last updated: Apr 12 2022 at 19:14 UTC